| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Date: 12 Jun 2002 13:00:17 +0000
- Lines: 11
Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost writes:
> This is an excellent idea. However I would use
> ALLOCATED_TO_LIR and ASSIGNED_TO_END_USER.
> That way we clarify the subtle difference while
> maintaining consistency with existing documentation.
This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
Robert
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- From: Nigel Titley
- Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- References:
- RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- From: Daniel Karrenberg
- RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
