Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Date: 12 Jun 2002 12:54:41 +0000
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:00, Robert Kiessling wrote:
> Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost writes:
>
> > This is an excellent idea. However I would use
> > ALLOCATED_TO_LIR and ASSIGNED_TO_END_USER.
> > That way we clarify the subtle difference while
> > maintaining consistency with existing documentation.
>
> This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
Don't you mean assignments? :-)
> who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)