<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

  • To: Anne Lord < >
    Joao Luis Silva Damas < >
  • From: Geoff Huston < >
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:00:50 +1000
  • Cc: 


To clarify, the values that APNIC would prefer to use are:

ALLOCATED PORTABLE
ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE
ASSIGNED PORTABLE
ASSIGNED NON-PORTABLE

As I mentioned before, these values would be consistent with those in
IPv4 (which take effect in August when the migration to version 3 of the
RIPE database is complete).

Comments?




I would be in favour of this clarity in the field regarding PORTABLE and 
NON_PORTABLE.

However, the distinction between "ALLOCATED" and "ASSIGNED" is perhaps a 
bit subtle.



regards,



  Geoff




















    

  • Post To The List:
	
      
		
    • 	    
	    

      • 
		
    • 	    
	    

      • 
	
    	

    • 











<<<
Chronological
>>>


Author
  
Subject


<<<
Threads
>>>