| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 09:11:55 +0200
At 06:00 AM 6/12/2002, Geoff Huston wrote: >However, the distinction between "ALLOCATED" and "ASSIGNED" is perhaps a bit subtle. When these attributes were created, those particular words were in deemed both descriptive and clear. Maybe the language concerned has shifted underneath in the meantime ;-). As a native speaker of one of its dialects, would you make a suggestion for improvement? Daniel
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- From: Nigel Titley
- Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- References:
- Status field for inet6num objects
- From: Joao Luis Silva Damas
- Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- From: Geoff Huston
- Status field for inet6num objects
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
