| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: neutrality and nat
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 04:56:51 +1000 (EST)
Why not take this tone with the first email rather then set the mob off? On Wed, 15 May 2002, Randy Bush wrote: > an important part of the rirs' job is information/education. trying > to pretend that nats don't exist is not realistic. trying to explain > the trade-off would be useful. the hard part would be doing so usefully > without getting into a document mire. > > randy >
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: neutrality and nat
- From: Nigel Titley
- Re: neutrality and nat
- References:
- Re: neutrality and nat
- From: Randy Bush
- Re: neutrality and nat
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
