Re: [lir-wg] Reserved addresses
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 01:45:59 -2200
I agree.
People shouldn't be blocked if they have other views, but Flemming obviously
isn't trying to contribute to any discussion.
Given the nature of his messages, I would classify them as spam. They are
filling up our mailboxes and are not relevant in any way to what is being
discussed.
- Martin
>-- Ursprungligt meddelande --
>Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:41:35 +0200
>From: Andre Oppermann oppermann@localhost
>Subject: Re: [lir-wg] Reserved addresses
>
>
>
>It would be really nice if someone at RIPE could block this guy on
>this list. He just annoys as much as he is off-topic with the promotion
>of this IPv8 stuff.
>
>--
>Andre
>
>
>Jim Fleming wrote:
>>
>> Each /8 is very valuable, worth between one and two Billion U.S. dollars.
>> It is important to have a broad base of "Trustees" that help to manage
>all
>> of cyberspace. That avoids having companies with monopoly control over
>> a space or the Registry for the space. The 11-bits of extended addressing
>> (22 total) that can fit in the IPv4 header, allow all address spaces to
>be
>> expanded. Existing "owners" do not have rights to that expanded space.
>> Eight Trustees plus the existing owner form a 9-person "Board" to manage
>> each space. Here is one example. 17*8=136
>>
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
>> 017/8 Apple Computer Inc. Jul 92
>> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
>> 0:136 PICTURES
>> 0:137 BBS
>> 0:138 PLACE
>> 0:139 KIDS
>> 0:140 SPACE
>> 0:141 APPRAISERS
>> 0:142 CHANGE
>> 0:143 CREATED
>> ==========================================
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Daniel N. Rasmussen" <daniel.rasmussen@localhost
>> To: "'Peter B. Juul'" <peter.juul@localhost; lir-wg@localhost
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:24 AM
>> Subject: RE: [lir-wg] Reserved addresses
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> > Could someone explain to me what the nets marked "reserved"
>> > in for example
>> > http://kmserv.com/testbed/ip-space.txt are expected to be
>> > used for? Special stuff or RIR address space?
>>
>> Well, looking at the above link and comparing it to the most recent one
>> (http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space), I would say the
>> latter.
>>
>> Eg.
>> 068-079/8 IANA - Reserved Sep 81
>>
>> now
>> 068/8 ARIN Jun 01
>> 069/8 ARIN Aug 02
>> 070-079/8 IANA - Reserved Sep 81
>>
>> > Peter B. Juul,
>> > Uni·C (PBJ255-RIPE)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel Rasmussen
>> dk.uunet
>
_______________________________________________________
Sök företag på Gula Sidorna
http://www.gulasidorna.se
