RE: [lir-wg] ICANN Reform
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:29:28 -0600
- Organization: Chagres Technologies, Inc
Disagree.
The RIR"s seem to think there is a world that is
a) includes ICANN
b) doesn't include ICANN.
What IMHO, believe is that should the RIR's depart, which
I'm against, this would open the oppertunity for other
organizations to take control.
ITU, being one of them. This would be a particularly BAD IDEA
Its also interesting to note that at least one RIR
hasn't really put this policy issue to its members as a propsed
policy. Really good for bottom up processes :|
There should be a "formal policy proposal" that goes to the
membership at large on the topic of "Should the RIR's bail
on IANA / ICANN". I haven't seen one.
John Brown
speaking personally
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lir-wg@localhost [
] On
> Behalf Of David Kessens
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:50 PM
> To: Daniel Karrenberg
> Cc: Hans Petter Holen; RIPE Local IR Working Grouo
> Subject: Re: [lir-wg] ICANN Reform
>
>
>
> Daniel,
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> >
> > I personally think the RIRs should *now*
> > walk away from ICANN for better or worse.
>
> I agree.
>
> We should spend our time on building a new framework.
>
> A good start could indeed be by building upon the existing
> ASO. However, it is also important to consider the relations
> between the RIRs and IETF/IAB etc..
>
> David K.
> ---
>
