[lir-wg] New Draft in-addr.arpa Policy Document - Reminder

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:32:21AM +0200, Janos Zsako wrote: Re: Re: [lir-wg] New Draft in-addr.arpa Policy Document - Reminder

[...]

> I would have a short question and a suggestion for clarification.
> 
> 1. Is the last paragraph of 3.0 not superfluous in the light of the last
>    paragraph of 5.0?
> 
>  3.0: "LIRs should maintain DNS resource records for address space assigned 
>        to End Users from their own address space, even if the user obtains
>        connectivity from a different LIR."
> 
>  5.0: "LIRs should provide reverse delegation corresponding to an assignment 
>        during the complete validity period of the assignment."

Good point. We'll make the change.

[...]

> 2. I think the intent of first paragraph of 3.0 is to accept a reverse
>    delegation of an address block as soon as there is ANY address space
>    assigned from it (i.e not ALL has to be assigned prior to reverse
>    delegation), assuming that the whole block has been allocated to that
>    LIR (this is relevant only for /16s). Therfore I suggest something like:
> 
>   "The RIPE NCC accepts requests for reverse delegation solely for address 
>    space that HAD BEEN ALLOCATED TO THE REQUESTING LIR AND AT LEAST ONE PORTION
>    OF WHICH has been registered by the LIR as assigned to End Users in the RIPE
>    Whois Database."
> 
> (You will probably find a better word than "portion" to describe this).

Good point. We will incorporate a suitable change.

Regards,

-- 
leo vegoda
RIPE NCC, Registration Services
Assistant Manager