Draft Agenda for LIR WG at RIPE42
Thu Apr 11 10:47:50 CEST 2002
> F.3 "MIR/SUB-LIR" Proposal (WG action from RIPE40) > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/lir-wg/20010701-20020101/msg00138.htm l > > Is this still needed following the implementation of "status: > LIR-PARTITIONED" (documentation) or do we still need a more > hierarchical allocation scheme (policy)? > As far as it goes the LIR-PARTITIONED status does not address our needs for a more structured allocation/assignment policy.
[ lir-wg Archive ]