Draft Agenda for LIR WG at RIPE42

> F.3 "MIR/SUB-LIR" Proposal (WG action from RIPE40)
>
>
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/lir-wg/20010701-20020101/msg00138.htm
l
>
> Is this still needed following the implementation of "status:
> LIR-PARTITIONED" (documentation) or do we still need a more
> hierarchical allocation scheme (policy)?
>

As far as it goes the LIR-PARTITIONED status does not address our needs for
a more structured allocation/assignment policy.