<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: more specific routes in today reality

  • To: Peter Galbavy < >
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest < >
  • Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:07:12 +0200 (MEST)
  • Cc: "lir-wg@localhost" < >
    "routing-wg@localhost" < >
  • Reply-to: Kurt Erik Lindqvist KPNQwest < >


> > This however, does not mean though that multiple uplinks to more than one
> > provider gives you more security than mulitple uplinks to one.
> 
> I completely disagree with you.
> 
> Multiple links may have failure modes in addition to and identical to some
> of the failure modes of a single connection, but multiple links also removes
> a complete calls of failure modes associated with a single connection.
> 
> This is a pretty fundemental tenet of communications systems in general as
> is not limited to IP.

Well, teoretically this is certanly true. However, looking at reality, I
don't think this is wort an extra entry in the global routing table, and
where do this stop? How about the SOHO user that I described? Why are not
they allowed broken up PA or PI space to be multihomed?

- kurtis -





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>