Re: more specific routes in today reality
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:22:31 +0200
- Organization: Lambda Solutions
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:21:09 +0200
Gert Doering gert@localhost wrote:
> "Multihoming" with something less than full tables won't really solve
> anything
Right.
- as "multihoming without an AS number", it's some weird thing
> that has its place, but doesn't buy you much in the long run.
well. multihoming with private AS also could work. Combined with
Conditional Announcement, it's a really useful possibility.
> (As for your example with the IX - this could be done without globally
> visible space just fine, it's not "multihoming")
Well. IX space & DNS space is "IMHO" a special case which cannot be used
on corporate or business isp.
We need some clean-up in the "special" cases. Swamp Space, pre-RIR phases
and more...
When we cannot clean up the "swamp" from the past, can we do clean work in
the future ?
jan
--
Jan-Ahrent Czmok http://www.lambda-solutions.de
Technical Advisor ISP Hofdcker Str. 14, 65207 Wiesbaden
Tel. +49-(0)-174-3074404
