<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: more specific routes in today reality

  • To: "Vladimir A. Jakovenko" < >
  • From: Gert Doering < >
  • Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 00:21:09 +0200
  • Cc: Gert Doering < >
    Jan-Ahrent-Czmok < >
Hi,

On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:17:25PM +0300, Vladimir A. Jakovenko wrote:
> >> Some providers are multihomed
> >> but cannot cover the costs, even for a small lir.
> >If you want to be multihomed, the costs for routers & co. are far higher
> >than for being LIR.  If you can't afford being LIR, be single-homed.
> 
> Are you sure? Old BGP-capable Cisco routers (like 25xx), especialy from eBay 
> are very cheap. 

"Multihoming" with something less than full tables won't really solve
anything - as "multihoming without an AS number", it's some weird thing
that has its place, but doesn't buy you much in the long run.

(As for your example with the IX - this could be done without globally 
visible space just fine, it's not "multihoming")

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>