RE: more specific routes in today reality
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 17:45:42 +0300
Hi,
There are other solutions for multihoming with NAT but I think we are
again hitting that NAT against no NAT issue.
I think that I should say it now to avoid further flamewars.
NAT is not always a possible solution. It may be good to use it in some
cases but it is not in others. Those other cases are the ones that this
discussion is about. Or at least I think so :)
CCNP Boyan Krosnov
Network Administrator
Lirex Net
phone: +359-2-91815
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mirta Matic [
]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:55 PM
> To: Sascha E. Pollok
> Cc: Gert Doering; Vladimir A. Jakovenko; lir-wg@localhost
> routing-wg@localhost
> Subject: Re: more specific routes in today reality
>
>
> Hello,
>
> have you ever heard for RADWARE solution for that problem?
> Some RADWARE box can check distance to destination via both
> ISP's and makes
> decision from what IP address range have to get address for
> NAT (of course,
> customer have to have two ranges of addresses). If connection
> via one ISP
> failed, all traffic will be rerouted via another using IP
> address from IP
> address range of that ISP.
>
> Mirta Matic
> mirta.matic@localhost
>
> tel: +385 1 4914 207
> fax: +385 1 4914 222
