<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: more specific routes in today reality

  • To: "Sascha E. Pollok" < >
  • From: Gert Doering < >
  • Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:44:12 +0200
  • Cc: Gert Doering < >
    "Vladimir A. Jakovenko" < >

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 01:22:43PM +0200, Sascha E. Pollok wrote:
> >>     "- If PI is requested for multi-homing please explain why the second
> >>        provider cannot route PA space as a more specific route (with the
> >>        PA block holder adding a more specific route too)."
> >
> >This doesn't specify who is originating the BGP prefix.  Both providers
> >have to *route* it, of course.
> 
> We got this reply to a PI-space request for a customer that does
> not have his own ASN therefore ISPs would need to originate the
> route. Don't you think that this implies originating the prefix
> from two different ASes? (would appear when doing "sh ip bgp incons").

Yes.  But this would not be any different from getting a PI space and
announcing it inconsistently, that is, originating it from both ISPs. 

Which is not a good practice in any case - I agree on that.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>