Re: [hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal / reservation revisited?
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 13:21:56 +0200
To me, this rather sounds like a case for revisiting reservation,
rather than arguing for a new registry type/structure/rules.
Am I missing something?
Wilfried.
______________________________________________________________________
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:58:24 +0200
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
To: Adrian Bool aid@localhost
Subject: Re: [hostmaster-staff] Re: MIR proposal
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:05:41PM +0100, Adrian Bool wrote:
> I feel that international networks require the ability to operate according
> to the same rules as RIPE - just working on a smaller scale - as another
> level down in the hierarchy.
Not only "international networks", but also national ones that have a
hierarchical structure of re-sellers.
> i.e We should should be able to apply for more IP space once we have
> sub-allocated 80% of our allocation to our in-country networks - natuarally
> in a responsible manner, according to the same rules that an RIR would
> allocate space to these in-country networks.
Sure.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
