Re: MIR proposal
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:39:18 +0200
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:13:03PM +0100, Stephen Burley wrote:
> Ok the proposal.
[..]
I can understand your needs, and your proposal is a way to tackle it.
The problems do not only arise on "multinational scale", though. We're
a small-to-medium ISP/LIR (with only about 1.5 /16's), and we're also
facing the fact that we'd like to do better hierarchical routing, facing
a structure of independent re-sellers that again have their own
re-sellers, all of them getting their IP addresses from us.
So what I could imagine is a less formal organization structure without
a "MIR" - but permit LIRs, under certain circumstances, to do
sub-allocations, like "*allocate* a /22 to this reseller and /21 to
that one".
Maybe a combination of both. A MIR + LIR structure for the Really Huge
networks, and LIR + sub-allocations for smaller networks with a need
(or the desire) for hierarchical structure.
And yes, this is also very much needed for IPv6. Getting a /35 and
having to hand out individual /48's to customers of customers of ours
isn't going to build proper hierarchical routing.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
