<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

  • To:
  • From:
  • Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:43:55 +0100

Sabrina,

It would be nice if the new draft could be mailed to the relevant lists
before the RIPE 40 meeting so people can have a meaningful discussion.
Please can you indicate if/when a new version of the policy document will be
published?

Thanks,
Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sabrina Waschke [
] > Sent: 09 August 2001 17:16 > To: James Aldridge >; ipv6-wg@localhost > Subject: Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made > > > > James, > > Your request for a subsequent sub-TLA allocation was evaluated > according to the Provisional IPv6 Assignment and Allocation > Policy (4.2.5. Criteria for Subsequent Sub-TLA Allocations). > Please see: > > http://www.ripe.net/ipv6 > > As you know this policy is under revision and the current > discussions on these two mailing lists are encouraged. > > All three Regional Internet Registries receive input from their > communities and based on this a new draft of the policy document > will be presented at the upcoming RIPE 40 meeting in Prague. > > The presentation "IPv6 Bootstrap Phase" given at the last RIPE > meeting in Bologna can be found at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-39/presentation s/ipv6develop/ A Supernational Registry is a special case. You may want to use this presentation as a starting point to discuss the minimum allocation size. Kind regards, Sabrina Waschke -- o------------------------------------------o | Sabrina Waschke sabrina@localhost | | Registration Services Operations Manager | | | | RIPE NCC tel +31 20 535 4444 | | www.ripe.net fax +31 20 535 4445 | o------------------------------------------o

  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>