| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:52:00 +0200
In your previous mail you wrote: Also, it hasn't really been shown why we need slow-start *in slow-start space*(!). It's not like we want our own TLA, but I think the RIRs are being way too conservative. Old IPv4 habits...? => protection of a business... (if this is not the case someone can believe this). Francis.Dupont@localhost
- Post To The List:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
- References:
- Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
- From: Gert Doering
- Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |
