<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

  • To: "James Aldridge" < >
    "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
    < >
  • From: "Nipper, Arnold" < >
  • Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 17:15:55 +0200
  • Organization: DE-CIX, the German Internet Exchange

James schrieb:

>
> Now, in the IPv6 world I'm told that we can't get an IPv6 sTLA for our
direct
> backbone customers or for any of our other national networks because
KPNQwest
> Finland (covered by the eu.eunet supernational registry) already has our
one
> sub-TLA.
>
> Of course, that one sub-TLA gives us a total amount of address space which
is
> adequate for our current requirements for the whole network but once this
is
> split over each of about 20 separate autonomous systems, each with their
own
> routing policy, this is hardly going to result in optimally aggregatable
> routing...
>

Actually, you have a /34, haven't you? EU-EUNET-20000403 and
DE-XLINK-20000510. Very interesting that KQDE got an assignment as at that
time they already where 100% KQ.

-- Arnold





  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>