<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

  • To: James Aldridge < >
  • From: David R Huberman < >
  • Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:02:44 -0700 (MST)
  • Cc: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" < >
 
> The last reply from the RIPE NCC hostmasters said, "Because Supernational
> Registries may not receive multiple IPv6 allocations you would need to have
> allocated 80% of the networks in your current sTLA before we could issue more
> address space."

Please forgive my ignorance and allow me to ask, "where is it written that
Supernational Registries may not receive multiple sub-TLAs?"

Is this a RIPE NCC interpretation of the bootstrap criteria or is it
actually written down somewhere?

/david
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>