<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

New Proposal

  • From: Stephen Burley < >
  • Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:00:23 +0000
  • Organization: UUNET
  • Reply-to: 
Hi
	I would like to here your comments on the following proposal. After
being in an audit and getting a list as long as my arm of broken objects
in the DB it turned out that the majority of the objects where pre RIPE
and not subject to the same checks. I therefore propose that all
inetnums without a status (being pre-RIPE there is no status)  should be
marked with a new status of PR (Pre RIPE) and therefore be ignored by an
audit tool. Also all other objects prior to ripe should be flagged so as
to be ingnored in an audit, making it much easier to see what really
needs fixing.

Your thoughts and comments please.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Burley         "If patience is a virtue, and ignorance is bliss,
UUNET EMEA Hostmaster            you can have a pretty good life 
[SB855-RIPE]                 if you're stupid and willing to wait"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>