Re: Summary: Fixed Boundary (/29) Assignments
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:42:35 +0100
Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>
> Dear LIR-WG,
>
> Here is an attempt to summarise the recent discussions on this mailing
> list regarding possible fixed size assignments.
>
> Following a review of the comments, it looks like the majority does
> not believe that a special assignment policy is needed. Most
> contributors agreed that there is no need to make a distinction in
> policy relating to different access methods. All assignments should be
> made on actual needs and according to the current IP address policies.
>
> The comments showed concerns about the administrative procedures
> required for these kinds of assignments. However, it was felt that
> these addresses need to be accounted for in some way. A possible way
> forward would be to initiate discussion surrounding the set of
> information necessary to justify these assignments while providing an
> efficient way for the LIRs to provide services to their customers.
How about some entries in the FAQ for these cases? Something along
the lines I posted on Monday referring to similiar policies like
dial-up and virtual webhosting.
--
Andre
> I realise that I did not touch on every aspect of the discussion but I
> hope that this is a fair summary in order for you to move forward
> Looking forward to a continuation of this debate.
>
> Best Regards,
> Mirjam Kuehne
> RIPE NCC
