Re: Fixed Boundary (/29) Assignments
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:23:14 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Adrian Bool wrote:
> I see little point in giving a user one usable IP address by assigning
> eitehr a /31 or /30 to the point to point link. All you achive with that is
> wasting *2 or *4 the number of IP addresses used.
Sure, this is true. But you've missed my point. Unless RIPE chooses to
decide the network architecture for ISPs - which it has never done before,
and is surely unenforceable - these remain recommendations at best.
> If the /24 is a 'stanard' range agree amonst us that would probably
> make things easier. Do windows boxes have a default private IP
> it assigns to ethernert interfaces? If so, using that seems like a
> good option.
yes, they do - they follow the DHCP expectations and use 169.254.0.0/16
(see http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-manning-dsua-06.txt)
but that is a block that should never be routed.
joshua
