RE: A Question
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 14:33:46 +0330
>As far as I know, there are two feasible cases:
>
>1. The customer MOVES from one ISP to another
>2. The customer connects to ANOTHER ISP, while using the other ISP
Hi,
Many Thanks for all comments.
The case I meant was exactly the 2nd one. Customer has an old connectivity
to LIR-1 and have got a new connection from LIR-2.
>2 is usually performed either by the use of BGP or by the use of static
>asymmetric routing, or RADWare's LinkProof.
That's the case.
>In the 2nd case, the reason here is usually high availability and/or load
>balancing between links/ISPs. In this situation, the customer NEEDS both the
>assignments.
In this case, what should people at LIR-1 Do? Can they ask LIR-2 people
to stop forcing customers?
And if the answer is positive, What's the rule, if LIR-2 people continue
to behave like that?
>I believe that 'legal', a LIR cannot just 'demand' that a customer would
>return their previously-assigned IPs unless there's a reason (i.e., the
>situation is case #1). It might be that that specific LIR is having problems
>with its AW (let's say their AW is 256 ips, and the customer already has
>IPs, it might be that the 'new' LIR needs to send a RIPE-141 to RIPE - and
>they might be too lazy to do that).
I agree. Another possiblity is that LIR-2's people are trying to fulfill
their own test period ( according to RIPE NCC slow starting ) and
somehow attack to LIR-1 reputation.
Kind Regards,
IPM LOCAL REGISTRY, Tehran-Iran
Saeed.
