<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Allocations for "always-on" ISPs

  • To: "Neil J. McRae" < >
  • From: "Gert Doering, Netmaster" < >
  • Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:15:20 +0100
  • Cc: Jan-Erik Eriksson < >
    Kurt Erik Lindqvist < >
    Bruno Ciscato < >

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 01:04:22PM +0000, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> > NAT:ed addresses means that the customers' (private) address is not
> > reachable from outside the point in which you do the NAT. This point
> > resides within the primary (point of sale) operator's network.
[..]
> 
> Yes it is, you just have to put in the configuration.

Protocols like H.232 need special support in the NAT box to work at all,
and even then, they break if the customer has more than one box that
he wants to reach from the outside, like "a PC in the living room and
one in the office", which could be done with a /29.

While I do not advocate giving everybody a /29 (or a fixed address at all,
for that matter), I don't think that NAT can be the answer for every
customer network.  Some are quite happy with NAT, others want to do things
that are not supported by current NAT boxes, so we should not try to 
force NAT upon them.

If the IPv4 address space runs out, let's go to IPv6... it's there :-)
(but I agree it certainly needs more work).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
SpaceNet GmbH               Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299






  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>