Re: Discussion: Address Council election procedures
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 100 19:28:40
May be one AS one vote? It will be much more representativ...
--- On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 15:23:25 +0200 Poul-Henning Kamp
phk@localhost wrote:
> In message <011e01c01cbb$3cb28b50$a20400c1@localhost>, "Hans Petter Holen" writes:
> >> >My understanding of the consensus from the previous meetings was that
> >> >electronic voting was felt to be not yet widely deployable technology.
> >> >But we may want to reconcider that with experiences from the ICANN
> >> >at large election and perhaps from ARINs and APNICs plans.
> >>
> >> I would actually argue that electronic voting is preferred because it
> >> will allow people unable to participate in RIPE meetings to vote as
> >> well.
> >
> >I agree with you but the trouble we ran into when discussiong this at a
> >previous meeting was that it is easy to define the electorate (who gets to
> >vote)
>
> One LIR one vote ?
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@localhost | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
>
---------------End of Original Message-----------------
Regards,
Alexey Sadchikov
--------------------------------------------------------------------+
MTU-Intel company, E-mail: asadchik@localhost I
Technical Director Phone +7 095 258-7839,7878 I
Date: 09/12/00 Time: 19:28:40 FAX +7 095 258-7870 I
--------------------------------------------------------------------+
