Re: Further to the training questions
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:57:45 +0200
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 11:11:05AM +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:55:00 +0000
> Stephen Burley stephenb@localhost wrote:
>
> > 2. To relieve the stress on the wait que i would like to see a standard
> > a min ssignment window applied to all none new LIR's, something not too
> > small but something not too large say a /25 - this means that the
> > hostmasters would not be boged down with small insignificant requests
> > and would be able to concentrate on answering the larger requests thus
> > getting used to larger business needs.
>
> I would not like to see this, I think that it is vital that
> there is no assignment window to new registries. Although I think
> that if new registries are being managed by exeprienced people
> who have demonstrated their understanding of the procedures
> then they should be given an assignment window. So if you left
> UUNET to setup stephenswarez.com and opened up an LIR
> you would not have to go through the zero assignment window
> issues again.
>
I really see 'none new LIR's' above. So either you have the feeling a LIR
understands what it is about and you give them a reasonable assignment
window (/25 or something) or you don't and you keep them on 0.
I agree with stephen that something in between doesn't really help.
Experienced people is difficult to see at a new LIR, or do you want some
'hostmaster certificate'? A new LIR doesn't have many request mostly and
it will soon be clear they understand, so the AW will be raised fast.
Regards,
Andre
