Discussion: Address Council election procedures
Tue Sep 12 15:23:25 CEST 2000
In message <011e01c01cbb$3cb28b50$a20400c1 at hph>, "Hans Petter Holen" writes: >> >My understanding of the consensus from the previous meetings was that >> >electronic voting was felt to be not yet widely deployable technology. >> >But we may want to reconcider that with experiences from the ICANN >> >at large election and perhaps from ARINs and APNICs plans. >> >> I would actually argue that electronic voting is preferred because it >> will allow people unable to participate in RIPE meetings to vote as >> well. > >I agree with you but the trouble we ran into when discussiong this at a >previous meeting was that it is easy to define the electorate (who gets to >vote) One LIR one vote ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
[ lir-wg Archive ]