[gigabell-technik] Re: RIPE Hostmasters visiting LIRs
Thu Sep 16 18:48:12 CEST 1999
In message <37E11CDE.62530B5B at telia.net>, Amar writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp skrev: >> >> In message <37E113A2.D37D190C at telia.net>, Amar writes: > >> I actually disagree. It is rather obvious from the various >> consistency reports that some LIR's are more in need of a >> visit than others... > >The numbers suggested have the pontential to create a >sitiuation where the hostmasters would be able to visit >those LIR:s that have a problem with consistency. > >But you bring up a point here. Well, my point was not quite one of those you present, it was more along the lines: Wouldn't it be a more profitable use of RIPEs funds to visit the provably needy LIRs ? even at a 50/50 funding split, this is going to drain a lot of resources from RIPE, so we might as well try to get some tangible benefits from it. Of course we could also try to add a new policy which says that if a LIR after three warnings from RIPE havn't gotten their act together they get a RIPE visit, and the full bill for that visit (the "RIPE-MIB": RIPE-Men In Black :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk at FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
[ lir-wg Archive ]