Modifications to the inet6num in the RIPE Database
Tue Mar 16 18:48:15 CET 1999
In message <009D5362.46E0DF3C.25 at cc.univie.ac.at>, "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACO net" writes: > Taking this one step further, and looking back at what we did with IPv4, > where it would be feasible to say 131.130/16, implying 220.127.116.11/16, > I wonder if it wouldn't again be worthwhile to restrict the use of these > shorthand notations in the Address Registry? There is certainly something to be said for making it easy for programs to parse the registry. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk at FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
[ lir-wg Archive ]