inetnum aggregation

Dear all,

I happened to see a strange assignment made by a LIR to a customer.

The strange thing about this was that it was made on the same day
(by the same person), however contained 15 inetnums of a /24 each,
although it could have been assigned as two inetnums only (two ranges
of addresses).

Although I feel it is quite clear from ripe-159 that each inetnum
object should contain a *range* of addresses (and one should try
to register only one inetnum for a request - which is BTW not always
possible - but all examples are given in this sense), it would be good
to state somewhere that aggregation _is_a_goal_ in case of the inetnum 
objects too. I came to this conclusion (that it is worth mentioning 
this) after the respective registrar, after I mentioned this problem
to them, asked me whether it makes any difference if they aggregate
or not... :(

Regards,
Janos