RE: last second action completed
- Date: Mon, 8 May 95 16:02:40 PDT
I do agree in general with the idea, but can we (ISP's) provide the same
level of service to those VSE's ?
How are we (Local IR's) going to handle Domain Name Services for
those VSE's customers ? With an emphasis on in-addr.arpa resolving ?
/Alain
On Mon, 08 May 1995 13:57:38 +0200 Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>This is to complete an action on Mike Norris to re-send
>the original message concerning VSEs.
>
>Please refer to the archives for the discussion
>that followed.
>
>Daniel
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date: Fri, 20 May 1994 09:57:15 +0200
>From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost
>Sender: dfk@localhost
>To: Erik-Jan Bos <erik-jan.bos@localhost
>cc: Local IR local-ir@localhost
>Subject: Re: Address space for individuals
>
>
> > Erik-Jan Bos <erik-jan.bos@localhost writes:
> > > This sums up my personal opinion.
> >
> > Great, quite along my personal opinion, but we need a consistent
> > approach among all Local IRs.
>
>We will write something up next week. If someone else does before
>us we can use that!
>
>My proposal would read like:
>
> - very small enterprises (VSEs) are those <32 hosts now
>
> - last resort registries will not assign address space to VSEs
>
> - VSEs can use private address space (RFC1697)
> - VSEs are easy to renumber once they connect
> - VSEs are likely to connect with one host only
>
> - service provider registries will assign VSEs smaller amounts
> of address space than 8 bits where possible
>
> - service provider registries will register these smaller amounts
> in the RIPE database when possible
>
>Rationale:
>
> Very many VSEs with 8 bits of address space each will use up
> too much address space.
>
>
>
>Is this acceptable to all?
>
>Implementation: If this was accepted the NCC could accept classles
>inetnums very soon even before the indexing is fully classless.
>
>Question: Should we publish such things as RIPE documents or just
>circulate them among registries as "current practise recommendations".
>I personally think we should publish them, but have heared reservations.
>
>Daniel
>
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>
-------------------------------------
E-mail: Alain Golan alain@localhost
Date: 05/08/95
Time: 16:02:40
This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
