Re: Address space for individuals

• To: Daniel Karrenberg < >
• From:
• Date: Fri, 20 May 1994 11:08:42 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:

According to Daniel Karrenberg....
> 
> My proposal would read like:
> 
> 	- very small enterprises (VSEs) are those <32 hosts now
> 
> 	- last resort registries will not assign address space to VSEs
> 
> 		- VSEs can use private address space (RFC1697)
> 		- VSEs are easy to renumber once they connect
> 		- VSEs are likely to connect with one host only
> 
> 	- service provider registries will assign VSEs smaller amounts
>           of address space than 8 bits where possible
> 
> 	- service provider registries will register these smaller amounts
> 	  in the RIPE database when possible
> 
> Rationale:
> 
> 	Very many VSEs with 8 bits of address space each will use up
> 	too much address space.
> 
> 	
> 
> Is this acceptable to all?

Sounds very sensible. Demon would be happy to follow these guidelines.

Regards,

Mark.

-- 
/\/\ark Turner                       Demon Systems / Demon Internet
Home: mt@localhost (PGP key available)        42 Hendon Lane, London
Office: mark@localhost (+44 81 3490063)             N3 1TT, England
*** IP level dialup Internet connectivity for a tenner a month! ***
PGP server: email to pgp-public-keys@localhost with subject 'help'

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: Address space for individuals
    • From: Daniel Karrenberg