<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Class C subnetting and Novell TCP/IP

  • To:
  • From:
  • Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 14:40:58 GMT
  • Cc:

Guys,

I just got this from one of our Novell experts (we have a group of people
working in this area). Sounds like Novell have got ot right, at least
in the code. May be a documentation problem, I guess, if their customers
are not understanding...

Anyhow, I suggest that:

(a) Keith rejects the reason, saying that it's understood that Novell
    do support this subnetting....

(b) if said customers persist perhaps Daniel could pursue this with his
    Novell contact to get a definitive statement?

Bob

----- Begin Included Message -----

From DREW@localhost Tue Mar 22 14:29:19 1994
To: bob@localhost
From: "Andrew Gregg" DREW@localhost
Date:         Tue, 22 Mar 1994 14:29:25 GMT
Subject:      Re: Class C subnetting and Novell TCP/IP
Reply-To: A.Gregg@localhost
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     WinPMail v1.0 (R2)
Content-Length: 831

Novell Fileserver routing DOES support class C subnetting.  Until 
this earlier this year we had a Novell Fileserver routing between a 
subnetted class C address...

Class C subnetting using novell netware requires at least 2 bits 
mask bits in the class to allow for subnetworking.

therefore our mask was FF.FF.FF.C0 and our IP numbers were 
assigned... nnn.nnn.nnn.128 to 190 for one sub net and 65-126 for 
the other.

=====================================================================
Andrew Gregg                      | A.Gregg@localhost
Faculty of Informatics            | 100024.3074@localhost
University of Ulster              | 
Cromore Road, Coleraine,          | Tel: 0265 44141 x 4243 
Londonderry, N. Ireland.          | FAX: 0265 40916
======================================================================


----- End Included Message -----




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>