<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: RIPE Handle document

  • To: (Piet Beertema)
  • From: (Antonio_Blasco Bonito)
  • Date: Tue, 7 Dec 93 16:42:40 MET
  • Cc:
  • Organization: GARR Network Information Service

Piet,

> What is "actual RIPE database"? Lots of the info therein is
> coming from local registries, in whatever format the latter
> maintain their info/database.
The actual database is that one with source: RIPE in its etries.

>     This is needed because local registries often use the RIPE-NCC database
>     software package.
> I fail to see what this has to do with the case. And I don't
> even know whether your statement is correct: some registries
> may maintain their database in a "RIPE-like" format without
> using the RIPE-NCC database software package.
In this case they do not have problems with the RIPE handle.

>     I think it would be easier and better to define other suffixes which
>     could be used (and accepted by the software). The local registry then
>     simply send person entries which already contain unique handles to the NCC.
> See above: a local registry may generate unique handles, but
> they don't serve the purpose of uniqueness in the context
> where that uniqueness is required.
If an handle is unique it could be used in many different contexts,
i.e. database with source: RIPE and source: SOMETHINGELSE

----------                                                     ----------
Antonio_Blasco Bonito                          E-Mail: bonito@localhost
GARR - Network Information Service      c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito
c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR                         Tel: +39 (50) 593246
Via S. Maria, 36                                    Telex: 500371 CNUCE I
56126 PISA   Italy                                   Fax: +39 (50) 904052
----------                                                     ----------



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>