<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Draft Agenda local-ir WG

  • To: Local Internet Registries in Europe < >
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1993 15:43:46 +0200
  • Cc: RIPE Chairpeople < >
    RIPE WG Chairpeople < >


Draft 
Agenda for the local IR WG 

During RIPE Meeting
Thursday September 16th 1993


0.	Reports for Information

	- short reports of significant events at local IRs 
	- short reports of significant events at the NCC
        - short report from local IR workshop the previous day


1.	Proxy Network Entries in RIPE Database

Some service providers have expressed the wish to act as proxy
for some of their clients when registering in the RIPE database in order
to protect their clients privacy. Under the present policy this
is not possible. A proxy policy could be established.
Is this a goo idea?

Proposed points:

	- only on explicit request from client
	- only if proxy has 24x7 NOC
	- proxy must reveal client's identity to Internet Registries
	- proxy must reveal identity on request of other network operator
          in case of ongoing problems OR take immediate measures to stop
	  traffic
	


2.	Autonomous Systems Database Template

Has been circulated. Should be accepted as this.


3.	Should we maintain a list of local IRs and publish it?

Speaks for itself


4.	Input for new NCC activity plan.

What do you really want? and pay for it!


5.	AoB


Daniel



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>