Re: RFC1400 on Transition of Registration Services

• To: (Jon Postel)
• From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
• Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 17:29:43 +0100
• Cc:

  > postel@localhost (Jon Postel) writes:
  > 
  > 
  > Daniel:
  > 
  > Hmm.  I read the memo as describing a transition from DDN-NIC to the
  > Internic registration service.  I didn't assume that that implied any
  > change to existing delegations, but then maybe i know too much to see
  > how the uninitiated would interpret it.

The problem is that the uninitiated reading just that memo will infer
that there is only one registry and consequently that they have to go there.

  > In any case, we can certainly have another memo to clarify the delegation
  > aspect of things.

I'm afraid that won't be sufficient unless that other memo is at least
clearly referenced in 1400.

Daniel

• Post To The List:

• References:
  • Re: RFC1400 on Transition of Registration Services
    • From: Jon Postel