Re: RFC1400 on Transition of Registration Services
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 9:39:07 EST
Daniel,
When I brief the InterNIC Registration Services I alway reference
delegated registries. The RIPE NCC is the example that I give of
one that is correctly operated. Somehow when writing this RFC I
got caught-up in the operation of our facility and unintentionally
failed to say anything about the RIPE NCC. I feel you are correct
about the potential for mis-directed request. I will work with you
either to add to RFC1400 or document the delegation of services to
the RIPE NCC. I plan to be at the IETF most of the week.
Scott
>
> Scott, Jon,
>
> I am extremely concerned that RFC1400, titled
>
> Transition and Modernization
> of the Internet Registration Service
>
> has been written and published without any reference to the
> European part of the Internet Registration Service. This will
> cause unnecessary confusion among European users and result in
> more rather than less mis-directed registration requests.
>
> I suggest that a revised version describing the distributed nature
> of the Internet Registration Service and clearly directing European
> users to the RIPE NCC be published within days rather than weeks.
> I will have to leave for Columbus shortly. I wil suggest some changes
> to you there and like to discuss this with both of you.
>
> Daniel
>
