Re: ripe-81 work
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 93 16:11:11 +0100
> Peter Lothberg roll@localhost writes:
> > 2) networks having an existing AS-number in database but reflected differ
> ently
> > in the routing tables (the can sometimes be a config error).
> >
> > 128.86.0.0 in AS786 (database) and AS1755 (BGP)
>
> This is due to the fact that 128.86.0.0 is used as the London DMZ, and
> even if the EBS receives if with AS786 from the Janet RBS, it will
> prefer the cheapest route, locally connected to the EBS when announced
> to the outside world.
From ripe-81:
...
o An IP network number can and must only belong to one
AS. This is a direct consequence of the fact that at
each point in the Internet there can be exactly one
routing policy for traffic destined to each network. In
the case of the IP network which is used in neighbor
peering between two ASes, say at the border between two
ASes, a conscious decision must be made as to which AS
this IP network number actually resides in.
...
So either the JANET RBS or the EBS should stop injecting this
net into EBONE. Any problems with that?
Daniel
