<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: RFC1366 Revision

  • To:
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • Date: Tue, 16 Feb 93 18:14:05 +0100
  • Cc: Local Internet Registries in Europe < >
  > Havard.Eidnes@localhost writes:
  > 
  > Oh, well...  If some of you remember the form I sent to you as input to the
  > common form, I specifically stated that even a class C network can be
  > subnetted, and that such a strategy could be useful to conserve some
  > address space.  From the above, I read that this is not the intention
  > anymore.  Can someone explain why?  (This is a section where the new
  > version differs a bit from RFC 1366.)

I can't that was one of the questions I had as well.
I have had legitimate cases with 2-4 hosts / subnet and allocating 1C for
each is wasteful. We should go CIDR right away.

Daniel
  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>