Wed Mar 17 16:36:40 CET 1993
> Peter Lothberg <roll at bsd.stupi.se> writes: > > So either the JANET RBS or the EBS should stop injecting this > > net into EBONE. Any problems with that? > > Technical problem, if we announce it with the Janet RBS, other boxes > on that DMZ might be dependent on the RBS. ACK that. So it should be injected from the EBS. As an aside: ---- When writing ripe-81 we did consider similar cases and came up with a generic one: DMZ1 DMZ2 AS A ------ AS B ------ AS C You have to decide into which ASes to put the DMZ networks. One thing that is worth considering here is that if ASA and ASC touch in one and the same router in ASC in traceroutes only the nets DMZ1 and DMZ2 are visible. If DMZ1 is in AS A and DMZ2 is in AS C the traceroute might show: ... DMZ1 (in AS A) DMZ2 (in AS C) ... And it is by no means obvious from this that traffic has crossed AS B. > Suggestion, use the Ebone network for the DMZ... Looks right.
[ lir-wg Archive ]