[irrtoolset]Making IRRToolSet compile...
Thu Jan 22 10:53:57 CET 2004
Hi, i had 4.8.1 compile on a x86 gentoo-linux 2.4.22 with gcc2.95.3, but peval produced a segmentation fault so i went back to 4.7.3 which works well. The binary distributions (both 4.7.3 and 4.8.1) don't work on my system :-( Cheers Jan Jon Lawrence wrote: > On Wednesday 21 January 2004 9:55 pm, Havard Eidnes wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>me again. Someone pointed me towards IRRToolSet which is a bit >>newer than RAToolSet. I'm trying to make IRRToolSet 4.8.1 >>compile on NetBSD 1.6 with gcc 2.95.3 and the libsdc++ which came >>with that compiler. >> >>First off: it seems that almost all of the diffs I sent earlier >>against RAToolSet still have to be applied to IRRToolSet. >> >>Second: how has anyone got IRRToolSet 4.8.1 to compile?!? I have >>to ask, because I get: >> >>c++ -c -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -I/usr/pkg/include >>-I/usr/X11R6/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../src -I../../Core >>prefix.cc prefix.cc: In method `void MPPrefixRanges::and(MPPrefixRanges >>*)': prefix.cc:1147: implicit declaration of function `int assign(...)' >>gmake: *** [prefix.o] Error 1 >>gmake: Leaving directory >>`/usr/pkgsrc/net/IRRToolSet/work/IRRToolSet-4.8.1/src/rpsl/rpsl' >> >>...and implicit declarations in C++ are as far as I know fatal. >>How can this compile at all on any other platform? >> >>Fixing this appears to require more C++ skills or familiarity >>with the code than I have, so assistance on this point would be >>much appreciated. >> > > I also haven't yet managed to get it to compile - I've just setup a debian 3.0 > box so that I have a system with <gcc 3.x.x on which to play. The binary > version runs fine on the Debian box, which is good enough for my purposes at > present :) > > Could someone post a system spec (software wise) that is known to work (for > compiling) - please include distro if possible. > > Regards, > Jon > -- Jan Boogman / Swisscom IP-Plus AS3303 / Backbone Engineering / CCIE#7345