[ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Tue Nov 9 10:26:32 CET 2010
On 9.11.10 4:29, Francis Dupont wrote: > We would appreciate if you let us know by the end of November 17, 2010 if > you have read the document and whether you support the publication of the > document. > > => yes Hi, Thnx for your support (for support from all of you :) ) > > As long as we get at least 8 statements of support and no significant issues > are raised, we will ask the RIPE NCC to publish the document after fixing > minor editorial issues (if found). > > => there is at least one error: IKEv2 relies on IPsec-v3 so it is not > possible to require IPsec-v2 and IKEv2 with IPsec-v3 optional. > There are two ways to solve this: make IKEv2 optional or IMHO far better > swap IPsec-v2 and IPsec-v3. Theoretically I agree with you. But we try not to currently exclude too much hardware. What percentage of current equipment you can buy supports IPsec-v3 ? > > BTW I think the correct spelling for UPNP is UPnP (lower case 'n'). Will fix, thnx. /jan
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101117): Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]