[ipv6-wg] Re: Expected time frame for IPv6 deployment
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Expected time frame for IPv6 deployment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IANA depletion in less than 1 year?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Sun Mar 14 06:34:29 CET 2010
On Sunday 14 March 2010 01:00:28 pm Isacco Fontana wrote: > If I can help you we're starting to delivery ipv6 on our > backbone (about 90 PE). Our infrastucture is mpls but > the ipv6 mpls control plane isn't yet implemented by > vendors... The promises continue to be just that, many years on... > so we chosen implement dual-stack on GRT > followed by 6VPE (dual-stack) for vpn mpls. A reasonable plan. > The plan to deploy was divided: > 1) Planning > 2) Upgrade backbone > 3) Deploy > Total time: 2 years for backbone > > Other problem is related to customers. We can't force to > change or upgrade the end-point devices ($$!!) so the > time delivery for customers will be longer. Indeed, but if you can get your backbone ready that'll be a huge step. All the best. Cheers, Mark. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100314/c39cec5f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: Expected time frame for IPv6 deployment
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IANA depletion in less than 1 year?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]