[ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Kessens
david.kessens at nsn.com
Fri Sep 4 18:36:47 CEST 2009
Gert, On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:25:09PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:47:29AM -0700, David Kessens wrote: > > You clearly have not read the minutes and/or have been at any of the > > meetings as we have run out of time every single meeting in the past > > few years and we needed the largest meeting room available. > > Which might not be *so* contradictory in the end. > > If we consider IPv6 to be "the mainstream Internet" in the future, the > IPv6 content will sort of naturally move to "the plenary" (because that's > what we all should be interested in, no?). If that happens, the question > "what remains to be specifically discussed inside the IPv6 WG" is a > valid one. Yes, that should be the natural course when IPv6 is going to become more mainstream. Even now already, we carefully weigh (with plenary/eof program committee) whether certain topics are more fit for the plenary program or for the IPv6 working group. David Kessens ---
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] A Modest IPv6-wg Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]