[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oliver Bartels
oliver at bartels.de
Thu Nov 24 19:22:24 CET 2005
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:10:10 +0100 (CET), Roger Jorgensen wrote: >Can't we all just drop using the word multihoming and IPv6 PI? The better solution is the enemy of the good solution. If IPv4 offers PI = provider _independence_ and multihoming and IPv6 doesn't, then IPv4 is obviously the better solution for those who requires this functionallity. Thus they won't use IPv6. Please keep in mind: The _customer_ votes, not you, not me. And as the majority of the large and a significant portion of medium size businesses are obviously not willing to accept an IP protocol not providing this functionallity, IPv6 will remain at it's current status: A technical playground for technically interested people. >They all reflect back to how thing was done with IPv4 and those ways are >doomed to fail with IPv6 simply due to the size of the IP space. Could you please explain this a bit more in detail ? To me this sounds like "engines will never fly". >Last I checked around there were some promissing new proposal on the >way for how to solve this very basic problem. Could you please be a bit more verbose. >And in the meantime, drop >the thought about multihoming and PI space, start to think about other >ways to use the possibility IPv6 give us. Hmm, please let me translate: "Even if the car doesn't drive and the engine doesn't deliver a single horse power at the wheels, drop the thought about driving, start to think about other way to use the possibility this great car gives us." Sound like newspeak: If we _think_ we can't solve the problem, drop discussing the problem. Best Regards Oliver Oliver Bartels F+E + Bartels System GmbH + 85435 Erding, Germany oliver at bartels.de + http://www.bartels.de + Tel. +49-8122-9729-0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]