[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sat Nov 12 09:26:21 CET 2005
Hi, On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 09:52:53PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > > That's the point. DENIC isn't doing this for themselves. They > > do this for *you* > > in a peer2peer or client/server world, this statement is fatuous So we abandon DNS, because it's a model from the last century? (Now that would be a policy proposal for the DNS WG, not for address policy -- but I'm all for it, this whole hassle with "finding a free domain name" and "going to court with name right holders" and so on is really annoying) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 81421 SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]