[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon May 9 14:55:35 CEST 2005
Hi, On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:50:11PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Fully agree with this view. > > I think if we really want to go into this direction, the HD ratio > modification seems a better idea. I actually have already thought long time > ago that we can't compare in terms of efficiency IPv4 with IPv6, so no > reason for keeping the same ratio. Why do you assume that the achievable efficiency isn't comparable? IPv6 has some bonuses ("all end-customer networks have the same size") and some drawbacks ("you need to achieve a much higher aggregation level if your internal routing system is ever going to cope with the sheer number of customer networks"), so overall efficiency "should" be similar. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: What is a site?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]