RE: Why not APNIC?

• From: Stephen Blackheath < >
• Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:10:30 +1300
• Reply-to:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mats,

Hello - I'm working with Ben Martel in New Zealand.

The reason why we are involved in RIPE rather than APNIC is because we have
an interest in developing an IP address management tool, and RIPE is also
interested in this topic.


Steve

>RE: Backend storage for an LIR IP mgmt system
>Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:04:40 +1300
>From: "Mats Dufberg" dufberg@localhost
>Another question just of curiosity.
>
>You seem to be working in New Zealand. Why are you involved in RIPE
> instead of APNIC?
>
>
> Mats
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mats Dufberg                                         Registry TeliaNet
> dufberg@localhost                                  Skanova/AO Networks
> +46 8 456 7274                                               Box 10707
> +46 70 258 2588                                    SE-121 29 Stockholm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8Hm1W7I0ehz47OHERAnSeAJ9wUOgm35/77khKdSFx2JuBKjFqpwCfaJ3M
C2MWCdFKXneUf6taGWqUe4E=
=JXgt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Post To The List: