<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: The Cidr Report

  • To:
  • From: Randy Bush < >
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:47:30 -0800
  • Cc:

> ASnum    NetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description
> 
> AS18566      751        6      745    99.2%   CVAD Covad Communications
> AS4134       825      178      647    78.4%   CHINANET-BACKBONE
>                                                No.31,Jin-rong Street
> AS4323       794      223      571    71.9%   TWTC Time Warner Telecom
> AS6197       814      430      384    47.2%   BNS-14 BellSouth Network
>                                                Solutions, Inc
> AS22773      401       17      384    95.8%   CXA Cox Communications Inc.
> AS27364      413       45      368    89.1%   ARMC Armstrong Cable Services
> AS701       1230      884      346    28.1%   UU UUNET Technologies, Inc.
> AS22909      412       81      331    80.3%   CMCS Comcast Cable
>                                                Communications, Inc.

are these numbers what i think, but hope not, they are?

e.g. is AS18566 the origin AS for 751 prefixes that could be
collapsed to 6?

if not, then perhaps the report could use some work.

if so, then
  o why are providers indulging is such extremely sick
    behavior
  o and who can hack the perl to generate filters for this
    so we can listen only to the aggregates

randy



<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>